{-# OPTIONS --lossy-unification #-}
open import 1Lab.Equiv.Embedding

open import Cat.Displayed.Univalence
open import Cat.Displayed.Fibre
open import Cat.Displayed.Total
open import Cat.Displayed.Base
open import Cat.Instances.Sets
open import Cat.Functor.Base
open import Cat.Univalent
open import Cat.Prelude

import Cat.Morphism
import Cat.Displayed.Morphism

module Cat.Displayed.Univalence.Thin where



# Thinly displayed structures🔗

The HoTT Book’s version of the structure identity principle can be seen as a very early example of displayed category theory. Their notion of standard notion of structure corresponds exactly to a displayed category, all of whose fibres are posets. Note that this is not a category fibred in posets, since the displayed category will not necessarily be a Cartesian fibration.

Here, we restrict our attention to an important special case: Categories of structures over the category of sets (for a given universe level). Since these all have thin fibres (by assumption), we refer to them as thinly displayed structures, or thin structures for short. These are of note not only because they intersect the categorical SIP defined above with the [typal SIP] established in the prelude modules, but also because we can work with them very directly.

record
Thin-structure {ℓ o′} ℓ′ (S : Type ℓ → Type o′)
: Type (lsuc ℓ ⊔ o′ ⊔ lsuc ℓ′) where
no-eta-equality
field
is-hom    : ∀ {x y} → (x → y) → S x → S y → Prop ℓ′
id-is-hom : ∀ {x} {s : S x} → ∣ is-hom (λ x → x) s s ∣

∘-is-hom  :
∀ {x y z} {s t u} (f : y → z) (g : x → y)
→ (α : ∣ is-hom f t u ∣) (β : ∣ is-hom g s t ∣)
→ ∣ is-hom (λ x → f (g x)) s u ∣

id-hom-unique
: ∀ {x} {s t : S x}
→ ∣ is-hom (λ x → x) s t ∣ → ∣ is-hom (λ x → x) t s ∣ → s ≡ t

open Thin-structure public

module _
{ℓ o′ ℓ′} {S : Type ℓ → Type o′}
(spec : Thin-structure ℓ′ S) where


The data above conspires to make a category displayed over $\mathcal{B}$. The laws are trivial since $H$ is valued in propositions.

  Thin-structure-over : Displayed (Sets ℓ) o′ ℓ′
Thin-structure-over .Ob[_] x = S ∣ x ∣
Thin-structure-over .Hom[_] f x y = ∣ spec .is-hom f x y ∣
Thin-structure-over .Hom[_]-set f a b = is-prop→is-set hlevel!
Thin-structure-over .id′ = spec .id-is-hom
Thin-structure-over ._∘′_ f g = spec .∘-is-hom _ _ f g
Thin-structure-over .idr′ f′ = is-prop→pathp (λ _ → hlevel!) _ _
Thin-structure-over .idl′ f′ = is-prop→pathp (λ _ → hlevel!) _ _
Thin-structure-over .assoc′ f′ g′ h′ = is-prop→pathp (λ _ → hlevel!) _ _

Structured-objects : Precategory _ _
Structured-objects = ∫ Thin-structure-over


We recall that the $S$-structures can be made into a preorder by setting $\alpha \le \beta$ iff. the identity morphism is an $H$-homomorphism from $\alpha$ to $\beta$. And, if this preorder is in fact a partial order, then the total category of structures is univalent — the type of identities between $S$-structured $\mathcal{B}$-objects is equivalent to the type of $H$-homomorphic $\mathcal{B}$-isomorphisms.

  Structured-objects-is-category : is-category Structured-objects
Structured-objects-is-category =
is-category-total Thin-structure-over Sets-is-category $is-category-fibrewise _ Sets-is-category λ A x y → Σ-prop-path (λ _ _ _ → ≅[]-path _ (spec .is-hom _ _ _ .is-tr _ _)) ( spec .id-hom-unique (x .snd .from′) (x .snd .to′) ∙ spec .id-hom-unique (y .snd .to′) (y .snd .from′))  By construction, such a category of structured objects admits a faithful functor into the category of sets.  Forget-structure : Functor Structured-objects (Sets ℓ) Forget-structure = πᶠ Thin-structure-over Structured-hom-path : is-faithful Forget-structure Structured-hom-path p = total-hom-path Thin-structure-over p (is-prop→pathp (λ _ → hlevel!) _ _) module _ {ℓ o′ ℓ′} {S : Type ℓ → Type o′} {spec : Thin-structure ℓ′ S} where private module So = Precategory (Structured-objects spec) module Som = Cat.Morphism (Structured-objects spec) _#_ : ∀ {a b : So.Ob} → So.Hom a b → ⌞ a ⌟ → ⌞ b ⌟ f # x = f .Total-hom.hom x _#ₚ_ : ∀ {a b : So.Ob} {f g : So.Hom a b } → f ≡ g → ∀ x → f # x ≡ g # x f #ₚ x = happly (ap hom f) x infixl 999 _#_ Homomorphism-path : ∀ {x y : So.Ob} {f g : So.Hom x y} → (∀ x → f # x ≡ g # x) → f ≡ g Homomorphism-path h = Structured-hom-path spec (funext h) Homomorphism-monic : ∀ {x y : So.Ob} (f : So.Hom x y) → (∀ {x y} (p : f # x ≡ f # y) → x ≡ y) → Som.is-monic f Homomorphism-monic f wit g h p = Homomorphism-path λ x → wit (ap hom p$ₚ x)

record is-equational {ℓ o′ ℓ′} {S : Type ℓ → Type o′} (spec : Thin-structure ℓ′ S) : Type (lsuc ℓ ⊔ o′ ⊔ ℓ′) where
field
invert-id-hom : ∀ {x} {s t : S x} → ∣ spec .is-hom (λ x → x) s t ∣ → ∣ spec .is-hom (λ x → x) t s ∣

private
module So = Precategory (Structured-objects spec)
module Som = Cat.Morphism (Structured-objects spec)

∫-Path
: ∀ {a b : So.Ob}
→ (f : So.Hom a b)
→ is-equiv (f #_)
→ a ≡ b
∫-Path {a = a} {b = b} f eqv =
Σ-pathp (n-ua (f .hom , eqv)) \$
EquivJ (λ B e → ∀ st → ∣ spec .is-hom (e .fst) (a .snd) st ∣ → PathP (λ i → S (ua e i)) (a .snd) st)
(λ st pres → to-pathp (ap (λ e → subst S e (a .snd)) ua-id-equiv
·· transport-refl _
·· spec .id-hom-unique pres (invert-id-hom pres)))
(f .hom , eqv)
(b .snd)
(f .preserves)

open is-equational public