open import Cat.Displayed.Fibre
open import Cat.Displayed.Total
open import Cat.Displayed.Base
open import Cat.Prelude

import Cat.Displayed.Reasoning
import Cat.Displayed.Morphism
import Cat.Reasoning

module Cat.Displayed.Univalence
  {o ℓ o′ ℓ′}
  {B : Precategory o ℓ}
  (E : Displayed B o′ ℓ′)
  where

private
  module B = Cat.Reasoning B
  module ∫E = Cat.Reasoning (∫ E)
open Cat.Displayed.Morphism E
open Displayed E
open Total-hom

Univalence for displayed categories🔗

We provide equivalent characterisations of univalence for categories $\mathcal{E}$ which are displayed over a univalent category $\mathcal{B}$ .

We say a displayed category $\mathcal{E}$ is univalent when, for any $f : x \cong y$ in $\mathcal{B}$ and object $A$ over $x$ , the space of “objects over $y$ isomorphic to $A$ over $f$ ” is a proposition.

is-category-displayed : Type _
is-category-displayed =
  ∀ {x y} (f : x B.≅ y) (A : Ob[ x ]) → is-prop (Σ[ B ∈ Ob[ y ] ] (A ≅[ f ] B))

This condition is sufficient for the total category $\int E$ to be univalent, if $\mathcal{B}$ is, too. The proof of this is a bit nasty, so we’ll break it down into parts. Initially, observe that the type of isomorphisms $(x, A) \cong (y, B)$ in $\int E$ is equivalent to the type

$\sum_{p : x \cong y} (A \cong_p B),$

consisting of an isomorphism $p$ in the base category and an isomorphism $f$ over it.

module _ (base-c : is-category B) (disp-c : is-category-displayed) where
  private
    piece-together
      : ∀ {x y} (p : x B.≅ y) {A : Ob[ x ]} {B : Ob[ y ]} (f : A ≅[ p ] B)
      → (x , A) ∫E.≅ (y , B)
    piece-together p f =
      ∫E.make-iso (total-hom (p .B.to) (f .to′)) (total-hom (p .B.from) (f .from′))
        (total-hom-path E (p .B.invl) (f .invl′))
        (total-hom-path E (p .B.invr) (f .invr′))

We first tackle the case where $f : A \cong B$ is vertical, i.e. $A$ and $B$ are in the same fibre category. But then, observe that our displayed univalence condition, when applied to the identity morphism, gives us exactly an identification $p : A \equiv B$ s.t. over $p$ , $f$ looks like the identity (vertical) isomorphism.

    contract-vertical-iso
      : ∀ {x} {A : Ob[ x ]} (B : Ob[ x ]) (f : A ≅↓ B)
      → Path (Σ _ ((x , A) ∫E.≅_)) ((x , A) , ∫E.id-iso)
          ((x , B) , piece-together B.id-iso f)
    contract-vertical-iso {x} {A} B f =
      Σ-pathp (λ i → x , pair i .fst)
        (∫E.≅-pathp refl _ (total-hom-pathp E _ _ refl λ i → pair i .snd .to′))
      where
        pair = disp-c B.id-iso A
          (A , id-iso↓)
          (B , f)

We can now use isomorphism induction in the base category to reduce the general case to contract-vertical-iso above. To wit: If $p : x \cong y$ is an arbitrary isomorphism (in $\mathcal{B}$ ), it suffices to consider the case where $y = x$ and $p$ is the identity. Here, $p$ is the isomorphism of first components coming from the isomorphism in $\int E$ .

  is-category-total : is-category (∫ E)
  is-category-total = total-cat where
    wrapper
      : ∀ {x y} (p : x B.≅ y) (A : Ob[ x ]) (B : Ob[ y ]) (f : A ≅[ p ] B)
      → Path (Σ _ ((x , A) ∫E.≅_))
        ((x , A) , ∫E.id-iso)
        ((y , B) , piece-together p f)
    wrapper p A =
      Univalent.J-iso base-c
        (λ y p → (B : Ob[ y ]) (f : A ≅[ p ] B)
               → ((_ , A) , ∫E.id-iso) ≡ (((y , B) , piece-together p f)))
        contract-vertical-iso
        p

    total-cat : is-category (∫ E)
    total-cat .to-path p = ap fst $
        wrapper (total-iso→iso E p) _ _ (total-iso→iso[] E p)
    total-cat .to-path-over p = ap snd $
        wrapper (total-iso→iso E p) _ _ (total-iso→iso[] E p)

Fibrewise univalent categories🔗

Using the same trick as above, we can show that a displayed category is univalent everywhere if, and only if, it is univalent when restricted to vertical isomorphisms:

is-category-fibrewise
  : is-category B
  → (∀ {x} (A : Ob[ x ]) → is-prop (Σ[ B ∈ Ob[ x ] ] (A ≅↓ B)))
  → is-category-displayed
is-category-fibrewise base-c wit f A =
  Univalent.J-iso base-c (λ y p → is-prop (Σ[ B ∈ Ob[ y ] ] (A ≅[ p ] B))) (wit A) f

Consequently, it suffices for each fibre category to be univalent, since a vertical isomorphism is no more than an isomorphism in a particular fibre category.

is-category-fibrewise′
  : is-category B
  → (∀ x → is-category (Fibre E x))
  → is-category-displayed
is-category-fibrewise′ b wit = is-category-fibrewise b wit′ where
  wit′ : ∀ {x} (A : Ob[ x ]) → is-prop (Σ[ B ∈ Ob[ x ] ] (A ≅↓ B))
  wit′ {x} A =
    is-contr→is-prop $ retract→is-contr
      (λ (x , i) → x , make-iso[ B.id-iso ]
        (i .F.to)
        (i .F.from)
        (to-pathp (i .F.invl))
        (to-pathp (i .F.invr)))
      (λ (x , i) → x , F.make-iso (i .to′) (i .from′)
        (from-pathp (i .invl′)) (from-pathp (i .invr′)))
      (λ (x , i) → Σ-pathp refl (≅[]-path refl))
      (is-contr-ΣR (wit x))
    where module F = Cat.Reasoning (Fibre E x)